|
|
|
BIOLOGICAL AGENT
DETECTION
|
|
|
|
Detection and identification
of biological warfare agents in the hospital environment could, in some
cases, be accomplished using standard laboratory microbiology or serology
techniques. The use of cultures,
microscopy, immunofluorescence assays, and Gram’s and other staining
procedures (and in some cases, virus isolation techniques) can help identify
the causative organisms for anthrax, plague, smallpox and some viral
hemorrhagic fevers. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are capable of
identifying botulinum, ricin, and other toxins.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, performing
cultures and other procedures on some biological agents is extremely risky,
and the generation of secondary aerosols could easily lead to casualties
among laboratory personnel. Some
biological agents are so infective that even warfare research laboratories
have handled them only under extremely sophisticated biological safety
conditions. In addition, analysis
techniques that are readily available are rarely rapid procedures, and even
tests which can be accomplished in-house may not yield results for 12 to 48
hours. Some specialized laboratories
can perform extremely accurate and sensitive testing, such as the DNA-based
polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but results of these tests could be
significantly delayed.
|
|
|
|
Like nerve agent patients,
the initial treatment for biological agent victims will very likely be based
on their condition at presentation and in the hours that follow, and on an
index of suspicion that a biological incident has occurred. Withholding specific antibiotics or other
definitive treatment pending laboratory confirmation of the causative
organism could sharply decrease the chances of successful recovery from
infection by some agents.
|