Notes
Outline
Bioterrorism: An Overview
Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Program
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  Bioterrorism
History of
Biological Warfare
14th Century: Plague at Kaffa
Slide 4
History of
Biological Warfare
18th Century: Smallpox Blankets
Slide 6
History of
Biological Warfare
20th Century:
1943: USA program launched
1953: Defensive program established
1969: Offensive program
disbanded
Biological Warfare Agreements
1925 Geneva Protocol
1972 Biological Weapons
Convention
1975 Geneva Conventions
Ratified
Bioterrorism
Bioterrorism:
Who are 1st Responders?
Primary Care Personnel
Hospital ER Staff
EMS Personnel
Public Health Professionals
Other Emergency Preparedness Personnel
Laboratory Personnel
Law Enforcement
Potential Bioterrorism Agents
Bacterial Agents
Anthrax
Brucellosis
Cholera
Plague, Pneumonic
Tularemia
Q Fever
Source: U.S. A.M.R.I.I.D.
Biological Agents of
Highest Concern
Variola major (Smallpox)
Bacillus anthracis (Anthrax)
Yersinia pestis (Plague)
Francisella tularensis (Tularemia)
Botulinum toxin (Botulism)
Filoviruses and Arenaviruses (Viral hemorrhagic fevers)
ALL suspected or confirmed cases should be reported to health authorities immediately
Slide 13
Slide 14
Advantages of Biologics    as Weapons
Infectious via aerosol
Organisms fairly stable in environment
Susceptible civilian populations
High morbidity and mortality
Person-to-person transmission (smallpox,   plague, VHF)
Difficult to diagnose and/or treat
Previous development for BW
Advantages of Biologics as Weapons
Easy to obtain
Inexpensive to produce
Potential for dissemination over large geographic area
Creates panic
Can overwhelm medical services
Perpetrators escape easily
Bioterrorism:
How Real is the Threat?
Hoax vs. Actual BT Event
Anthrax Bioterrorism
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
 Chemical & Biological
 Terrorism
1984:  The Dalles, Oregon, Salmonella  (salad bar)
1991:  Minnesota, ricin toxin (hoax)
1994:  Tokyo, Sarin and biological attacks
1995:  Arkansas, ricin toxin (hoax)
1995:  Ohio, Yersinia pestis (sent in mail)
1997:  Washington DC, “Anthrax” (hoax)
1998:  Nevada , non-lethal strain of B. anthracis
1998:  Multiple “Anthrax” hoaxes
Salmonellosis Caused by Intentional Contamination
The Dalles, Oregon in Fall of 1984
751 cases of Salmonella
Eating at salad bars in 10 restaurants
Criminal investigation identified perpetrators as followers of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh
Slide 24
Slide 25
Shigellosis Caused by Intentional Contamination
Dallas, Texas in Fall of 1996
12 (27%) of 45 laboratory workers in a large medical center had severe diarrheal illness
8 (67%) had positive stool cultures for S. dysenteriae type 2
Eating muffins or donuts in staff break room implicated
PFGE patterns indistinguishable for stool, muffin, and laboratory stock isolates
Criminal investigation in progress
Federal Agencies Involved in Bioterrorism
NSC
DOD
FEMA
DOJ
DHHS
Treasury
EPA
FBI
PHS
CDC
Secret Service
USDA
FDA
SBCCOM
USAMRIID
OEP
Cost of Bioterrorism
Agent Transmission
  Routes of Infection
Skin
Cuts
Abrasions
Mucosal membranes
   Routes of Infection
Gastrointestinal
Food
Potentially significant route of delivery
Secondary to either purposeful or accidental exposure to aerosol
Water
Capacity to affect large numbers of people
Dilution factor
Water treatment may be effective in removal of agents
Routes of Infection
Respiratory
Inhalation of spores, droplets & aerosols
Aerosols most effective delivery method
1-5F droplet most effective
Medical Response to Bioterrorism
Medical Response
Pre-exposure
active immunization
prophylaxis
identification of threat/use
Medical Response
Incubation period
diagnosis
active and passive immunization
antimicrobial or supportive therapy
Medical Response
Overt disease
diagnosis
treatment
may not be available
may overwhelm system
may be less effective
direct patient care will predominate
Public Health Response to Bioterrorism
Priorities for Public Health Preparedness
Emergency Preparedness and  Response
Enhance Surveillance and Epidemiology
Enhance Laboratory Capacity
Enhance Information Technology
Stockpile
Components of a Public           Health Response to  Bioterrorism
* Detection - Health Surveillance
* Rapid Laboratory Diagnosis
* Epidemiologic Investigation
* Implementation of Control                      Measures
Laboratory Response Network 
For Bioterrorism
CDC BT Rapid Response and Advanced Technology Lab
BSL -3
Agent Identification and Specimen Triage
Refer to and Assist Specialty Lab Confirmation
Evaluate Rapid Detection Technology
Rapid Response Team
Bioterrorism:
What Can Be Done?
Awareness
Laboratory Preparedness
Plan in place
Individual & collective protection
Detection & characterization
Bioterrorism:
What Can Be Done?
Emergency response
Measures to Protect the Public’s Health and Safety
Treatment
Safe practices